Membrane Technology for
Post-Combustion Carbon Capture from Coal-Fired Power Plants
Group 2: Tim Becker, Hye-In Son, Angel Asante, Nadeeka Karunaratne
- The driving force of the membrane gas separation process is the difference in pressure of the feed side and the permeate side of the membrane.
- Regardless of the material of the membrane, the feed-to-permeate pressure ratio determines the relative amounts of a component present in the resulting permeate.
- Membrane gas separation tends to be a more efficient method compared to the amine absorption, the method most widely installed currently
- The absorption is expensive to maintain and operate the systems
because it utilizes the corrosive absorbent and require the high
energy consumption during the regeneration step of the
absorbent.
- Polymer membranes are more accessible because the membranes
are relatively less expensive and easy to manipulate for a large
scale setting.
- RUBBERY POLYMER MEMBRANES :
- PRO : relatively high CO2 permeability and CO2/N2 selectivity
- CON : the tendency of crystallization. (lowers gas permeability)
- FACILITATED TRANSPORT MEMBRANES :
- Fixed site carrier facilitated transport membranes are more
favorable than those of mobile carriers.
- Facilitated transport membranes (PVAm/PVA) contain amine groups.
- Compared to the dry state, the PVAm/PVA membranes display better
CO2 permeance and very high CO2/N2 selectivity in the presence of
H2O
2CO2 + 2RNH2 + H2O <---> RHNCOOH + RNH3+ + HCO3-
MEMBRANE GAS SEPARATION